传奇真是扬我国威!!

  • x
    xisailuo
    ABC报道!!现在全世界都知道,咱中国特色的网游有多厉害“人”了

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200503/s1334618.htm
    一个上海的玩家因为卖了同伴的在传奇里武器而被杀。

    最可笑的是 中国的律师在此呼吁要保护 “网游虚拟财产”

    在国外, 根本没有“网游虚拟财产”的说法。SOE认为EQ里的东西根本毫无价值。
    爆血更绝,干脆说wow里的东西全归爆血所有。

    Online gamer killed for selling cyber sword
    A Shanghai online game player has stabbed to death a competitor who sold his cyber sword for real money.

    The sale created a legal dilemma because China has no law covering the ownership of virtual weapons.

    The China Daily newspaper reported that a Shanghai court was told Qiu Chengwei, 41, stabbed competitor Zhu Caoyuan repeatedly in the chest after he was told Zhu had sold his dragon sabre, used in the popular online game Legend of Mir 3,

    The online game features heroes and villains, sorcerers and warriors, many of whom wield enormous swords.

    Qiu and a friend jointly won their virtual weapon last February and lent it to Zhu, who then sold it for 7,200 yuan.

    Qui went to the police to report the theft but was told the weapon was not real property protected by law.

    "Zhu promised to hand over the cash but an angry Qui lost patience and attacked Zhu at his home, stabbing him in the left chest with great force and killing him," the court heard.

    'Private property'

    Newspaper reports on the incident did not specify the charge against Qiu but said he had given himself up to police and already pleaded guilty to intentional injury.

    No verdict has been announced.

    More and more online gamers are seeking justice through the courts over stolen weapons and credits.

    "The armour and swords in games should be deemed as private property as players have to spend money and time for them," said Wang Zongyu, an associate law professor at Beijing's Renmin University of China.

    But other experts are calling for caution.

    "The assets of one player could mean nothing to others as they are by nature just data created by game providers," an unnamed lawyer for a Shanghai-based Internet game company said.

    -Reuters
  • パックマン
    中国律师呼吁嘛,那国外律师怎么说?

    SOE和暴雪的做法,恩 那陈天桥是怎么作的?

    觉的拿国内律师和国外游戏公司比有点别扭.
  • s
    snoopys
    法律不同

    国外不是不肯承认虚拟物品的物权
    而且无法在法律的角度上确定虚拟物品的物权属性

    不同法律体系的东西根本无从比较
    就好像在美国,一个地方一件事是对的,但是你跑了几步去另外一个州就是错了
  • 提督的决断
    某个州的法律-----不可以同时提着两桶水在路上走。
  • T
    Taboo
    没记错天堂也不承认玩家享有虚拟财产所有权的。
  • p
    pzw
    法律上的条条框框和实际运用风马牛不相及啊……
  • k
    krit
    ...
    还不到时候啊...
  • 好蓝啊
    恩,盛大股票又要涨了……
  • T
    Taboo
    哼~ 反正我拜的是神作Lain
  • w
    weshooter
    归根结底,政治体制不同
  • p
    playhoo
    如果游戏公司承认虚拟财产,一旦发生服务器损坏,黑客破坏等导致数据丢失,那么玩家就有权力向厂商索赔
  • 纯战士
    关键是无数人把网游当成了真实的东西……是说人有问题呢还是游戏有问题呢?
  • 阿土
    游戏是死的人是活的.
  • T
    Taboo
    网络不过是物质界的一个次级位面

    何况网络游戏你的记录还是存在运营商的资料库里。
  • s
    snake21
    传奇是韩国游戏吧.
  • T
    Taboo
    当然,不过国内才有人玩
  • r
    ring
    有的人活着,但他已经死了
  • h
    humanxilo1
    无论什么东西,
    到中国这个大染缸来染一下,
    弃其精华,取其渣繁,
    就是具有中国特色的了