http://richarddawkins.net/articl ... cational-Supplement
http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6019140

先不说尼斯湖水怪到底存在与否，到底是不是恐龙，是不是能证明进化论的错误也就算了；因为理论A的错误，所以理论B就必然对，不管理论B是多么的漏洞百出也就算了

最揪心的是，用这样糟烂的逻辑写出来的所谓“教科书”居然可以登上大英帝国的讲坛荼毒生灵，实在是让人内牛满面阿

Creationist creed

Are dinosaurs alive today? Scientists are becoming more convinced of their existence.

Have you heard of the ‘Loch Ness Monster’ in Scotland? ‘Nessie,’ for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur.

Could a fish have developed into a dinosaur? As astonishing as it may seem, many evolutionists theorize that fish evolved into amphibians and amphibians into reptiles. This gradual change from fish to reptiles has no scientific basis. No transitional fossils have been or ever will be discovered because God created each type of fish, amphibian, and reptile as separate, unique animals. Any similarities that exist among them are due to the fact that one Master Craftsmen fashioned them all.”

[本帖最后由 mieumieu 于 2009-8-1 09:32 编辑]