Thanks for taking your time to answer my questions. When I said your answers would bring credibility to your work, I hoped you could answer all the questions in English, that will show us your capability in using English since you said that was improved mainly by using your software. But I can't help wondering what took you so long to answer my questions, don't get me wrong, you did answer my questions in English, good English I have to say, but I really want to know why you decided to post your answers in 2 months and it seemed like you had been ignoring my questions in the first place?

Your answers definitely gave us more details and let us understand it better. But I hope you will forgive me for being so clinging because your software seems too good to be true. Your answers prompted me to want to know more about it.

According to your answers, your software has lots of functions require different solutions look very difficult to accomplish. why bother including them in the first place? Take OCR as an example, even with the best OCR technology we have today, turning a physical copy into digital format is still painstaking for an operator, let alone a whole book? Since we can find almost every popular book in print a digital copy today, why bother?

Correct me if I am wrong: I guess voice recognition, semantic analysis and maybe a little bit of AI are the essential parts of your software, you claimed that you invented your own proprietary algorithm to deal with the problems. I am not a programmer. But it's hard for me to believe you can do them all just by yourself. since you need to understand both programming and English well. I thought your English was not very good before you tried out your software, right?

If you have the proprietary algorithm already to reduce a book in volume or, using your words, to summarize the story of the book, Why wouldn't you just make a standalone software to deal with these needs? It seems an easier way to win some users and approach your own personal success in business, don't you agree?

Thanks for your time, again.