想看日本宅男如何评价

笑尿了!

阿三根本不配当中国的对手

这评论不可乐啊

去龙腾网看看不就知道了。小日本的评论还挺逗，都是死宅。我记得有一个死宅说兲朝有本事攻过来来啊！你敢来我就敢跪！喷了，这哪是当初的小日本子。

看完评论，阿三是不是私底下叫中国爸爸？

中国也能被带路啊。。。。。。。。。。。。

被三哥叫兄弟了。。。好吧，三哥是我们三哥。

有部分是巴铁

唯独阿三没资格说中国的航母。先把自己坑爹免费航母的锅炉板砖整利索了再说

@kid1412 mark

早晚会有中美对峙的一天。到时候，倒霉的就是中国的邻国。
233max

似乎lz删节掉一些更欢乐的了
http://m.cjdby.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1469429&mobile=yes

全世界无产者联合起来

天下屌丝是一家

@哈里路亚 mark

Like other cheap Chinese products, if their missiles miss the target and hit India? So, India must be cautious and must take some precautionary measures to thwart the misfiring.
Agree (13)Disagree (4)Recommend (3)

就像其他廉价的中国货一样，他们导弹的质量很差，会丢失目标而误击印度？所以，印度必须小心，并采取预防措施以避免误伤。

parth (India) 12 hrs ago
It not about the arms, the very attitude of China is dangerous. It has problem with almost all neighboring countries. They think if Chinese bird sit on some tree then that tree is theirs. They captured Tibbet on such false historical assumptions. I am not sure, if they are thinking all those lands where Chengiz khan put his feet be theirs. you never know.
Agree (9)Disagree (3)Recommend (2)

并非武器的问题，而是中国的态度非常危险。他们几乎与所有领国有领土纠纷，认为如果中国人在一些树上停留过，那么这些树就是他们的。他们就是凭借这样的虚假历史依据来夺取西藏。我不确定他们是否会认为成吉思汗涉足过的岛屿都是他们的。很难预料。

padhav13 (pune) replies to parth
just say no to chinese goods thats enough for chinese guns to be silent

只要对中国货说不，就足以让中国大炮哑火。

原创翻译：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com

borat (kazakhstan) 12 hrs ago
LOL wanna be superpower China can't even make their own aircraft carrier. Japan was making its own aircraft carriers, destroyers, battleships way back in ww2.
Agree (20)Disagree (4)Recommend (8)

笑，中国想成为超级大国，自己却连航母都不会造。日本早在二战时就造出了自己的航母、驱逐舰和战列舰。

Sanjay (Pune) replies to borat
Now they will make copies of the aircraft carrier they bought from Ukraine. Copy cats.
Agree (8)Disagree (2)Recommend (3)

他们现在会山寨这艘购自乌克兰的航母。山寨猫。

Sunil Menon (Mumbai)
We ordered for our own aircraft carrier from Ukraine/Russia earlier than China. China got it fast and early too, whilst Indian aircraft is hanging at Ukraine shipyard and eating our hard earned money by raising the price every now and than. When we ordered the aircraft carrier, it was around Rs.4,000 crores. Now I believe it has cross more than Rs.15,000 crores and still going high and hiked. Russia is no more our friends, but a pure business minded country oozing out India blood by way of hiking and hiking with no end.
Agree (13)Disagree (0)Recommend (7)

我们比中国更早从乌克兰/俄罗斯下单订购航母。印度航母还停留在乌克兰船厂，时不时的价格提升吞噬了我们的血汗钱，与此同时，中国航母却更快服役。当我们下单订购航母时，价格大约是400亿卢比，如今我相信已经超过了1500亿卢比，并且仍然在增加。俄罗斯不再是我们的朋友，而是纯粹的商业思维导向国家，通过无止境的提价来榨干印度的血汗钱。

k b shahi (uk) 12 hrs ago
China must stop expansionism national policy. China swallowed Tibet the most peaceful nation, Now eyes on Arunanchal pradesh a integral part of India, Has taken part of Ladakh, has got dispute with Taiwan and Japan. They are going to get what they deserve in the coming years, first internally and then externally. The fall of China is obvious but communistic eye can't see it. Japan is right in claiming the island which they occupy for centuries. Japan is not alone and has got support of the many neighboring states.
Agree (10)Disagree (8)Recommend (2)

中国必须停止奉行扩张主义的国家政策。中国吞并了西藏这个最爱好和平的国家，如今目光盯上了阿鲁纳恰尔邦这个印度不可或缺的一部分，并已经占领了拉达克的部分地区，与台湾和日本陷入争议。他们在未来几年会得到该有的报应，首先是内部，然后是外部。中国的奔溃是明显的，但共禅眼睛看不到。日本对占领了数百年的岛屿宣称主权是对的。日本并不孤单，有许多领国的支持。

bhiyaa hater (Delhi) 12 hrs ago
TO THE CHINESE PPL..FORGET THE SMALL ISLAND AND PLZ TAKE A LARGER AREA....OUR BIHAR and U.P.......WE WILL ALSO PAY YOU FOR TAKING IT...
Agree (13)Disagree (11)Recommend (4)

致中国人民：忘记那个小岛吧，过来拿更大的一块地方...我们的比哈尔邦和北方邦...我们还会付给你占领费...

vgmenon9 (Oman)
Acquisition of an aircraft carrier by China does not alter the balance of power in South Asia or the Indian ocean region. The tactics of deploying a carrier is itself a major subject and it would take them many years to master the same. A Carrier is a white elephant at sea unless you have the escort ships to give close protection and long range maritime aircraft to give it the distant support. In other words it is termed as a carrier battle group. Today , only the US has credible carrier battle groups to boast of . On the other hand carrier is mostly used as a diplomatic tool and for force projection in areas of interest. The carriers that belong to the France , UK or India can be effectively utilised for the latter role.
Agree (4)Disagree (1)Recommend (1)

中国购买一艘航母并不会改变南亚或者印度洋地区的力量平衡。部署航母的策略本身是一门重大课题，需要许多年来掌握。除非有护卫舰只提供保护和远航程舰载机提供远距离支持，否则单凭一艘航母是无价值的。换句话说，需要的是航母战斗群。今天，只有美国有可吹嘘的航母战斗群。另一方面，航母大多数被当做外交工具，被用于往存在利益的地区投送力量。法国、英国或者印度的航母就可以在后一种用途上有效发挥作用。

Only solution for India is rapid modernisation of forces
Agree (9)Disagree (0)Recommend (5)

唯一留给印度的解决办法是快速现代化军队。

Winner (Chennai)
World Powers are just showing their muscle.
Agree (5)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)

世界大国在炫耀力量。

venu (Hyderabad)
Aircraft carrier is good but now-a-days there are so many effective missiles and torpedoes which can be fired from submarines that can destroy an aircraft carrier within minutes.That can lead to a huge loss.However,these all are assumptions and capability of an aircraft carrier can be assessed in real time war... Congrats to China for its ability to remake the carrier at home and not like India where money goes out to swiss account in the name of arms and weapons purchase...
Agree (9)Disagree (3)Recommend (5)

航母是个好东西，但如今有许多有效的导弹和鱼雷可以从潜艇发射，并在数分钟内摧毁航母。这会带来重大损失。然而，这些都是假设实战中可以发现航母的情况。祝贺中国在国内重制航母。印度就不一样了，以武器采购的名义把资金转入瑞士账户...

Telling it how it is (India) 9 hrs ago
It will not be long before Chinese carrier groups are stationed at Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Pakistan. Well done Indians for being so complacent and incompetent. You will pay the price for your actions (or lack thereof).
Agree (9)Disagree (2)Recommend (0)

中国航母驻扎在斯里兰卡、孟加拉国和巴基斯坦的日子不会远了。印度人如此自满和无能，好样的。你会为自己的行动付出代价的。

Common Man (Raipur) 9 hrs ago
India should immediately offer full military support to japan....
Agree (6)Disagree (8)Recommend (3)

印度应该立即向日本提供全面的军事支持...

Mr.mars (uk) replies to Common Man
India,the world largest weapon importer want to offer support to Japan?Joke of the century.
Agree (7)Disagree (0)Recommend (2)

作为世界最大的武器进口国，印度想要向日本提供支持？本世纪笑话。

Dr. V. Ghosh (Delhi) 9 hrs ago
This aircraft carrier is a paper tiger. It was a junk purchased from Ukraine when Ukraine. had strong relations with the U.S. Jewish lobby. No secret China and Israel are allies. While Israeli technicians did help it still can not effectively land planes. Research things and look deeper then the truth will emerge.
Agree (8)Disagree (13)Recommend (1)

这艘航母就是纸老虎，是中国在乌克兰与美国犹太游说团体关系紧密时从乌克兰购买的垃圾。中国和以色列是盟友，这不是秘密。以色列技术员提供了帮助，但中国仍无法有效起降飞机。仔细观察，真相就会浮出水面。

Nitin Bhardwaj (delhi)
not to worry....chinese stuff will not last for more than 6 months...
Agree (4)Disagree (12)Recommend (2)

别担心...中国货用不了6个多月...

Manu Mohan (Kerala, India)
We want a NATO like organisation in Asia to counter the Chinese influence. India must increase its presence in the pecefic ocean & south china sea.
Agree (4)Disagree (14)Recommend (1)

亚洲需要一个类似北约的组织来遏制中国影响。印度必须增加在太平洋和南海的存在。

Dr. Amrik Singh (Delhi) replies to Mr.mars 8 hrs ago
China supported by the U.S. Jewish lobby is too weak militarily. Five AGNI-6s (Agni-5 is an old missile) China will be history.
Agree (7)Disagree (15)Recommend (0)

中国受到美国犹太游说团体的支持，军事上也非常弱。5枚烈火6导弹（烈火5是老款导弹了）就能让中国成为历史。

bhiyaa hater (Delhi) 12 hrs ago
TO THE CHINESE PPL..FORGET THE SMALL ISLAND AND PLZ TAKE A LARGER AREA....OUR BIHAR and U.P.......WE WILL ALSO PAY YOU FOR TAKING IT...
Agree (13)Disagree (11)Recommend (4)

致中国人民：忘记那个小岛吧，过来拿更大的一块地方...我们的比哈尔邦和北方邦...我们还会付给你占领费...

要先学会说：DA YE,ZHE BIAN ZOU

[本帖最后由 kevinlwj 于 2012-9-27 09:07 编辑]

美国航母有里根号，咱们的与其叫“辽宁号”还不如叫“刘老根号”，战斗群内有驱逐舰“赵本山号”、“小沈阳号”，护卫舰“卡巴刘能号”“抽疯赵四号”，综合补给舰“山货谢广坤号”以及医疗救护船“香秀大脚号”，再带上“象牙山级”核动力潜艇，都不用出海，光听名字就能吓美帝一溜跟头

China is developing very fast, and it must be a awakening call for India. India, a next super power must match China in development. India has aircraft carrier but imported, but is on verge of developing his own. India has all capability to out shine China, but India is lagging behind because politics of state within state.
Agree (14)Disagree (7)Recommend (5)

中国发展非常快速，印度务必将其看做警钟。印度这个下一个超级大国必须在发展上与中国比肩。印度有航母，不过是进口的，处在有能力自主开发航母的边缘。印度完全有能力让中国相形见绌，但是由于错综复杂的政治而落后了。

Pritam singh (Elizabeth, New Jersey) replies to Manu Mohan 8 hrs ago
China is backward and poor and most Chinese are leaving the mainland many work as whores in North America.
Agree (12)Disagree (33)Recommend (1)

中国是贫穷落后的国家，许多中国人离开中国大陆在北美当娼妓。

Dr. Didar singh Gill (Fremont, USA)
Chinese are running by the shiploads illegally and coming here to the USA. What do they do here in the USA collect cans and worms and sell them and their ladies work in brothels. I was in China recently most people are malnourished.
Agree (5)Disagree (24)Recommend (0)

中国人非法坐货船来到美国。他们在美国捡拾易拉罐，他们的女人在妓院工作。我最近去了中国，大多数人营养不良。

Kulbhushan Kumar (Srinagar, Jammu and Kash)
China's new carrier is more a symbol of a future capability than a potent naval threat itself.
Agree (7)Disagree (0)Recommend (0)

中国新航母更像是未来能力的标志，本身并非强有力的威胁。

Shail (US) 8 hrs ago
Conventional arms can't overpower Japanese. They nearly beat Americans in WW-II. Finally, Americans had to resort to non-conventional weapons.
Agree (13)Disagree (3)Recommend (5)

常规武器压倒不了日本人。日本人几乎在二战打败了美国人。最终，美国人只好付诸非常规武器。

2楼 大亮 。。

大爷，这边走。
笑喷了！

爆炸，山寨，ODA

有没有韩国人的评价

只要对中国货说不，就足以让中国大炮哑火。

笔者曾经在某个项目中结识了塔塔集团的硬件工程师瓦帕杰·阿米尔汗（化名）。双方合作的非常愉快，一次工作之余，大家去附近的手抓饭馆吃饭。席间，瓦帕杰听见我们无意中议论起科尔巴电厂烟囱倒塌事件，于是就说起了在中国的一件逸事。
当时的瓦帕杰刚刚从中国的清华大学毕业，进了三一重工的某个技术研发部门。三一重工是中国数一数二的企业，瓦帕杰对这份工作很满意，所以工作也很卖力。
后来有一天，他们去三一重工的某个厂区做设备测试。那边厂区很大，但有片厂区被封闭了起来，只能看到围墙中厂房很壮观，从外面看，也能看到一些设备。中午吃饭的时候，瓦帕杰就向很早就进了公司的中国同事问起那片厂区是生产什么的？那个同事就介绍说，那是个备用厂区，设备主要是用来生产坦克及装甲车底盘的，但设备调试完成后，从来就没有开过工。这个厂区三一重工每年都要投入很多经费进行设备维护。瓦帕杰很奇怪地问：“那这个厂区岂不是年年赔本的？”中国的同事吃惊地看着他，然后告诉瓦帕杰：“即使是赔本，三一重工也要让这片厂区所有的设备保持最佳状态。”
那个中国同事是这么解释的：“如果三一不投入资金保证这个厂房设备时刻处于最佳状态，那么一旦有一天印度人和中国开战的话，中国根本来不及生产那么多武器装备，那么中国就将战败。如果中国战败的话，三一就是中华民族的罪人。所以无论投入多少钱，三一都必须这么做。”
瓦帕杰当时触动很大，不久他就放弃了在三一的工作回到了国内。他在席间对我们说：“当他听了中国的同事说的话，感到自己再也不能为这么一个虎视耽耽敌视印度的企业工作了。从回国的那天起，他就再也没有买过中国生产的东西。倒不是别的原因，只是良心上过不去。”

故事说完了，没别的意思。只是告诉大家，抵制华货，并不是什么经济上的问题，而是生存的问题……


《印度时报》2012年6月17日
作者：奇丹巴拉姆 （印度著名时事评论家）

[本帖最后由 7分黑木耳 于 2012-9-27 11:04 编辑]

巴基佬，1962年战争不是一回事。中国人准备充分，是入侵者。由于高喊“中印亲如兄弟”的口号，印度甚至没有期望与中国对峙，在边界地区没有任何军事装备。更重要地是，印中双方士兵人数对比是1:10。后果会怎样你也预料得到。不过，我们现在准备充分了。如果中国人胆敢冒险，那么会落得蒙受羞辱的下场。

鼓掌，撒花，好文啊，虽然有点似曾相识，但是好文啊、多年未见的好文。

马克一下

最喜欢看三哥的英文了

喷了

我有个朋友刚从西藏边境退伍回来，他说，他们的师长来视察问他们团长能顶多久，团长答一小时，师长勃然大怒，说你他妈能顶住半小时老子把头割下来给你

233max

嗯，的确差不多，差距也就是一个能自己造子弹，一个造不溜而已

三一重工那个段子喷了，记得以前看到的故事是发生在日本。。。。。。。。。。。。