As part of the investigation into Qihoo 360, counter‐accusations were levelled by the company against two fellow Chinese security firms, Baidu and Tencent. Analysis of products submitted for testing by these companies turned up some unexpected flags within their products, marked with the names of several test labs and implying some difference in product behavior depending on the environment they were run in – similar flags were also found in Qihoo products. However, no evidence could be found that this gave any significant advantage to either product, and in some cases it even seemed to put them at a disadvantage. Both firms were able to provide good reasons for including these flags in their products
原文地址：
http://www.av-test.org/fileadmin/pdf/VB-AVC-AVT-press-release.pdf在测试公司调查奇虎360的时候，该公司反过来指责另外两家中国安全厂商，百度和腾讯。通过对这两家公司的产品进行分析表明，其中含有一些特殊的标记，包括几家测试机构的名字，可能暗示了这些产品会根据环境的不同而表现出不同的产品行为。——但奇虎的产品中同样有类似的标记。然而，没有证据表明这给予这两家产品任何不正当的显著优势，有时候甚至会让它们处于劣势。两家公司都可以提供在产品中包含这些标记的正当理由。
我大360还真心有趣，被人抓到作弊的时候，不是解释问题，而是去咬别人。
